← Port Renfrew forest accountability

Follow one cutblock

Most of this project is about patterns across a whole region. This page does the opposite. It follows a single block all the way through, so the abstract question, "can the public see the full record before public forest is cut?", becomes concrete.

The block is SJsj5P8. It is a finalized BC Timber Sales cutblock near the San Juan River, about an hour up the road from Port Renfrew. BC Timber Sales is a government agency, so the seller here is the province itself. See it on the interactive map.

What it is

What sits around it

Desktop GIS against official public layers shows the block is close to water, fish, and recreation:

None of this proves harm or that any rule was broken. It shows the block sits among public values that a complete decision record would have to account for.

The community-forest part

SJsj5P8 also overlaps the Qala:yit Community Forest, a partnership the province has described as involving Pacheedaht First Nation, the Cowichan Lake Community Forest Co-operative, BC Timber Sales, and the Province, with revenue shared with the Qala:yit partners. That matters, and it cuts the right way: a full-cost ledger for this block should count the community benefit, not just the environmental cost. The decision about cultural and community value belongs to those communities, not to outside commenters. The public's ask is narrower: that BC Timber Sales show the full record behind a public-timber sale.

What the public cannot see

For a finalized public-timber sale beside a recreation site and fish-bearing water, these records are not public:

What you can do

The comment window for this block has closed, so the lever now is the records. The records-request guide has a ready email to BC Timber Sales asking where these records are held. Filing it, and publishing the answer or the silence, is how the gap gets closed one block at a time.

For blocks where the comment period is still open, the comment assistant has a ready-to-send comment for each.

Caveats

This is desktop analysis from public spatial data, not a field survey or a legal review. Distances are from projected geometry. The official stream class, fish-bearing status, and prescriptions can only come from BC Timber Sales records or field work. The point is not that this block is unlawful or harmful. It is that the public is asked to accept a decision it cannot fully check.