← Port Renfrew forest accountability

What the Government Has Known, and When

This is a timeline built from the government's own reviews and its own expert panels. It does not allege corruption or a coverup. It shows something simpler and documented: B.C. has repeatedly commissioned expert advice on old growth, accepted it, and then not delivered the change it promised, while the harvest continued. The pattern is the point.

The record

Why this matters here

A government that commissions the science, accepts it, promises to act, and then does not, is not a conspiracy. It is a documented accountability failure, and it is exactly why independent public-data work like this exists. It also raises a fair structural question, not an accusation: the same government earns revenue from selling Crown old growth (through BC Timber Sales) that it was advised to defer. When the body that profits is also the body that regulates and that promised reform, the public has every reason to ask for the full ledger and the site-level records before the next old stand is cut.

What this is not

This timeline does not claim anyone broke the law, took a bribe, or ran a coverup. It is built from public reviews, public panels, and public reporting. The honest reading is that the warnings were known, the promises were made, and the old growth kept falling, and that the records which would explain why are still not open.

Sources